Blog Post 20: The South Central Coyote. A lesson in self-pity, and an introduction to the fray9/28/2024 Direction and guidance are something that we often search for subconsciously. Even leaders need a teacher. Someone to call upon when they themselves need assistance in some form. In some scenarios, this can be quite challenging.
Sometimes the road we are traveling seldom offers any stops, let alone any stops that will offer anyone who can help us. That it is why the gift of recollection is one of the most important tools we can carry. Every single time we encounter a scenario where we are forced to make a decision, or a scenario where we must utilize previous experiences to determine the best course of action, we will call upon past experiences, both good and bad, to help us make the best choice possible. In the realm of challenge, there is no better teacher than the core memories we’ve obtained along the way. As humans, we are afforded a variety of emotions and feelings that other animals don’t get to experience, and even if they do, it’s on a level so primitive that it’s not even comparable. The coyote does not know pity. It does not know remorse. It knows only a handful of emotions, all of which circle around its survival and the protection of its pack. This is the standard for all things wild. The standard of a mindset that cannot entertain the concept of despair or self-pity because if they did, it is entirely possible that life itself would become compromised. If the coyote was faced with an adversary, especially one that was a known predator, there would be no conversation or bargaining. No pleading or negotiating. Just an understanding that this encounter would be a crossroad, and one of them would either escape, or one of them would die. There was never a third option for either of them because in the world of the wild, a third option does not exist. What the coyote does have, however, is a collection of core memories and genetic traits based purely on survival. These core memories will aid the pack in their encounters with challenges, and ultimately survival overall. Primitive instincts that remain intact, or physical features aiding in survival, are passed on from generation to generation. These traits will proliferate within a species and become a key factor as to how they remain a part of the world today. While the comparison to humans may seem like apples to oranges, it’s actually a lot more linear to our everyday lives than we may think. In fact, in some scenarios as humans it would be beneficial to reduce the margin of emotion and to exclusively focus on the primitive aspect of survival. This mindset is not strictly limited to a scenario involving physical survival, but rather a multitude of scenarios or encounters that will ultimately provide the individual with the means to press forward. Michael Mann is one of my favorite directors and I have a unique appreciation for writers and directors who are able to capture the audience in such a way that it creates interpretation. In the movie “Collateral” there are two main characters. One is essentially predator, and the other, prey. There is a level of capture and evasion throughout the entire film. A feeling of sustained fear and also sustained control is palpable throughout the entire film depending on the optic of the viewer. During one particular scene, they essentially escape a very violent encounter. Vincent essentially saves the life of Max- an unexpected use of force from the predator to his prey. Within those same few minutes, however, Vincent also takes the possibility of escape away from Max with the use of violence. After his escape was intentionally foiled, Max is then back to square one, and again, prey. As the two begin driving away there is a strange calm that washes over the two of them inside the car. There is no music. No climactic lighting. Just the night sky and the sound of the entire world sleeping while a small portion of the world burns. Then, almost as if the universe wanted to say hello, a coyote appears from the sidewalk and enters the roadway. The car comes to a stop and the two men watch, giving the animal the right of way. They watch the coyote negotiate an area so unfamiliar, yet it moves with intent. Almost as if it was supposed to be there. Almost as if negotiation or compromise of any kind was not an option, they simply must survive. There was no self-pity or concern for anything else other than to keep moving. Such is life for an animal in the wild, and such is life for us sometimes. In the grand scheme of things, some of us will never truly know what it’s like to live a life purely based on survival. We as humans are afforded this luxury. Even in scenarios where survival is our only focus, we are still provided with the concept of emotion, despair, and doubt. It is the fray where will learn how to prioritize our emotions and remove the concept of self-pity. It is in the fray where we will be introduced to a different version of ourselves. It is in the fray where we will learn how to be like the animal.
0 Comments
Imagine yourself post critical incident- in the immediate aftermath. Seconds following the incident itself. It’s over. Your feet are on the ground. You’re standing. That’s good. Looks like you survived. Your nose is inhaling massive amounts of air because you activated your parasympathetic nervous system, and you didn’t even know it. The human body is a lot more capable than we think, especially under stress.
A few minutes prior to that, your brain made the conscious decision to move everything non-essential to your survival off the table. It also gave the order to dump massive amounts of adrenaline into your bloodstream which increased your heart rate and blood pressure. At the same time, the adrenaline triggered the release of glucose and fats from storage within the body. Those fats provide energy for the body because snacks are important for your body when you’re trying not to die. Within those same seconds, your brain also decided to start pumping more blood into all your vital organs to get things moving, after all, safety is no accident. Your breathing started to become more rapid and shallow, and the small airways in your lungs opened to allow more oxygen for your brain to function faster, and sharper. All at the same time, your sense of smell, hearing, and overall alertness tripled in efficiency. Your pupils even dilated to allow more light in, which improves your vision. All of this happening in a matter of seconds. All of this happening because your brain wants you to be successful, and essentially, stay alive. Then just as quickly as it started, once we are safe, the brain slowly starts to turn off the burners and resume to a neutral state- semi-heightened, but neutral. Try to imagine the sound of a large jet turning off its engines. The slow sound of chaos reducing to a dull murmur while your ears ring and your mind wanders. Many of us can relate to that feeling as it has happened to us many times throughout our careers. If you’re reading this and you’ve never been there yourself, I assure you, if you’re doing this job right, it’s not a matter of if you get to survive, it’s a matter of when. And the most important thing to remember in the realm of survival is that we don’t get to choose the moment; the moment chooses us. Now that we have an idea of how the body works under stress, let’s take a wide-lensed look as to how we got there to begin with. Literally, yes, we got there physically. There was a reason, a crime occurring, maybe we saw something in real time, etc. But when it comes to the incident itself and how you react, speak, or even look when dealing with that incident, that is something that gets dissected after the fact, and may even play a role for how things proceed for you in the future. Try to look at this way- the incident itself, those few critical seconds that will be played on the news over and over again, that’s the “trailer” version of what happened. In order to understand the incident overall, society will need to watch the entire movie. It’s important to remember that the majority of society will never actually watch the entire movie. However, there may be a certain portion of society that will eventually watch the entire movie, and in an official capacity. That capacity will more than likely have the name “juror” attached to it and will consist of 12 very important people. This begs the question, why is a wide lens so important when it comes to a critical incident and understanding how the human brain works under stress? In a sentence: it gives us the opportunity to show that we are human. Empathy and understanding are paramount when it comes to any sort of justification for any type of force, especially deadly. Some parts of society may see that as some sort of cushion or safety-net that softens the actions of the individual- quite the opposite. It gives good investigators and good administrators the opportunity to find the truth, not premature fault or guilt. The expectation of most of society, however, is to find guilt, and quite quickly. In order to combat those expectations, any good agency will be transparent and offer as much information as they can with respect to the investigation and the parties involved. Regardless, the demands from the majority of society will never be met no matter what we do, or how fast we do it. Sadly, you could do everything right and you’ll still get a head of lettuce thrown at you as you leave. This job is never going to make everyone happy, it’s important to understand that before we go further. When it comes to the actions before, during, and after the incident, that is where we start to see good training and good education paying off. Or the opposite where we cringe at the action, or non-action, of those involved. We’ve all seen horrific videos of cops making mistakes. We’ve seen them because the media and a variety of outreach groups will make sure that we do, along with every other member of society. The frustrating part is that for every one video of a cop making a mistake, there are thousands of videos of cops doing it right. But as cops, we get to be put on trial in the court of public opinion, and that court does not believe in due process. On the topic of actions, or non-actions, they can, and will, absolutely dictate the outcome of any type of future legal proceeding, both criminal and civil. A lot of assumption and stock goes into the facts of the case and the evidence overall. While that may be a very large part of your case, it’s not the only thing that gets presented to a jury of your peers. Going back to the concept of the human element, and that element is definitely a two-way street when it comes to jury trial, it’s important to understand that we are the ones who initially get to set the tone, tempo, and the overall response to the scenario at hand. “Control” is a word that is not used enough when it comes to the escalation or de-escalation of a wide range of scenarios and circumstances. As we have seen time and time again, once we lose control, we lose a lot, and the final outcome usually goes from bad, to worse, to absolutely terrible. It’s the finite details within actions of violence that can change the perspective of the general public, specifically a juror. Sometimes it’s not only what you say or do, but it’s also how you say it, or how do it that really matters. It can be dialogue, tone, inflection, profanity, and even your own body language that will get put under a microscope for everyone not only to look at, but to study intently and develop their own opinions on- and in some cases, opinions based on things taken completely out of context. It’s important to remember that you will get seconds to make a decision, under stress, with limited options, and the defense attorneys will have days, weeks, months, or maybe even years to tear it apart piece by piece to make you look like a monster, and their client a saint. The defense is going to do their job, and if they’re the right attorney being paid the right amount of money, they are probably going to their job well. And that job is to either disprove your evidence, discredit your integrity, or dismiss your behavior as unethical, immoral, or both. Sometimes they pick one to focus on but it’s usually a combination of all three coupled with whatever else they can do to instill doubt- and “doubt” is a very powerful word in the realm of court proceedings and the ultimate decision of the jury. Doubt can be created through a variety of ways but one of the most common ways is through the human connection, or lack thereof. You can throw the kitchen sink at the jury when it comes to evidence, but it still won’t change that fact that you sounded like an asshole on video, and in some scenarios your words and attitude appeared to have escalated the scenario itself into what ultimately became a scenario that could have been avoided. Some cops will make the argument that their words or actions on camera or audio recording won’t change anything- I promise you; those same cops will be the ones crying in court begging God himself for a time machine once the rubber meets the road. Read the jury instructions on some of the most common charges for cops and you’ll see it’s not rocket science to put the pieces together, and we’ve been watching a lot of cops get prosecuted post 2020. What’s important to remember in that regard is that the jury instructions haven’t changed- society has. The human element has never been more powerful for this generation of law enforcement than it is today. In this world of chaos and violence that we navigate daily, we need to create a baseline that keeps us safe, that keeps society safe, and that operates within the letter of the law and agency policy. The majority of society unfortunately will never understand that violence is a very effective form of de-escalation, and when implemented properly, it will in fact save lives. The problem, however, is that society and the mainstream media have a very different expectation when said violence does, or does not, get to be used. Suddenly they are subject matter experts in a variety of fields and believe me they will let the entire world know exactly what you did wrong, and never what you did right. As much as we don’t care or put much stock into what people like that may think, it does matter for us in the long run, especially if that long run ends up coming after your retirement, or even your freedom. As cops, we must understand that any scenario we enter regardless of origin or even the actions of the bad guy, will already be at a disadvantage even before we arrive because of what happened in the year 2020. The groundwork was laid during that time and now we are simply walking on it. It’s important to walk with a purpose, do your job, but understand that every single thing we do or say, or don’t do or say, will be recorded in HD 4K with THX quality surround sound, and it will already be circulating on social media before you’re back at the office for your interview. We are going to lose no matter what. That’s not being pessimistic, it’s reality. We never win, and even if we do, we still pay people lots of money at the end of the day- even when it was completely justified, they still win. In a game where you’re going to lose no matter what, it would be wise to give yourself enough balance and stability to become an afterthought of a critical incident rather than case law, or a booking sheet. As of late I find myself being more active on the podcast than anything else, but there is a big part of me that still enjoys writing. I feel as though words on paper can deliver a different message and also leave much of it to interpretation for the reader. A few years ago, when I started all of this, I had no idea that writing would be the foundation that everything else would later be built on. Initially I had no intentions of following through with everything I have in front of me now, nor did I ever expect it to go anywhere. I was simply trying to navigate something to get somewhere. To this day I couldn't tell you what it was, or where I was trying to go. I just knew that if I didn’t do something, nothing would ever change.
When I started to dig a little bit deeper, I noticed that when I was writing, it was with an effort to pull certain things out of my head that I wasn't able to articulate verbally. At the time, I found it very challenging to talk about certain topics due to their nature or how they would make me feel. It should be noted however that in times past I was never one to shy away from, or even remotely think of an alternative option, when it came to dealing with certain things in my life that were particularly painful or horrible. If anything, I had enough experience under my belt both physically and mentally that I could probably tackle any sort of mental anguish or challenge that came my way. And I did. However, perhaps that was the problem. Did I reach my limit and not understand? Was I completely unaware that there was some type of cap or max capacity inside my skull that I was not aware of? For the first time in my life, I think my brain finally told me that we could not move forward until we did some house cleaning- some very deep, very thorough, house cleaning. I understood and respected this outcome and I agreed that there was work to be done, but I had no idea what the work would actually entail. Another character trait of mine is being overly optimistic- sometimes to the point of completely ignoring something very serious or threatening. Optimism is a great character trait for anyone to possess, but optimism is a brother to pessimism, and they are both sons of reality, and reality doesn’t care how optimistic you are. Reality will provide us with an abundance of clarity which is important for us to see from time to time. But reality can also be redundant and excessive, especially in career fields that demand that a certain part of your brain remain different than anyone else’s. A state of mind and physical being that runs on higher revolutions per minute than others. It's not to say we're superheroes or anything like that, we've just been told for so many years that something bad will happen to us, so we simply live in that mental mindset day in and day out. And that's just a small percentage of how we start to burn the candle from both ends. How we start to demand too much from the brain, and then our bodies, and far too frequently. As time goes on so does the stress and everything else that comes with it. And before we know it, our brains reach maximum capacity- but how they tell us will be a different experience, and will be vastly different person to person. Before we get to maximum capacity, it's important to understand that the brain will send us messages. Warning signs. Simple reminders that we need to pay attention to. These reminders can be simple things like physical reactions such as facial twitching, especially the eyes. Or something a lot more serious like high blood pressure. Although very different, both of these things may or may not present themselves physically, or at all. In fact, short of the physical feeling of being stressed, you may not get the luxury of a forewarning before something big happens. A “precursor to the incident” if you will. The important thing for all of us to understand is that we are all individual humans with individual mental and physical characteristics. There is no one person cover-all who is going to share the same experience in identical fashion with someone else. The overall outcomes and the experiences may be linear, but everyone is going to have their own unique experience when it comes to our brain and what it will do to our body- and that is where we will find the challenges. The important thing to remember is that we do have the opportunity in the present to dictate how we will feel in the future. The frustrating part is that you aren’t going to be able to see what you prevented. We can’t collect statistical data on things that never happened to us. But if and when you get to experience the bad, the horrible and horrific, the sadistic and total capacity of what your brain is truly capable of, it will be enough to make work as hard as possible, so it never happens to you again. Take care of yourself now, today. Take care of your needs both mentally and physically. Understand that if we ignore what the mind wants we will pay for it in a currency that cannot be paid for, but rather collected in the form of life and time. This blog entry is going to read more like an update rather than a post, but I think I owe the audience an explanation for my absence. It's been a long time since I've done a blog post and that's primarily because of the podcast. The majority of the writing that I have been doing lately is paired with the content on the podcast. In season 1 I would pair the podcast with the blog post. As of late, I’ve kind of been doing the opposite. One of the things I noticed from season 1 were the positive responses I got from the shows that featured guests. As a result, season 2 is going to have a lot more people on the show as guests, as well as myself being a guest on other podcast platforms. I'm currently wrapping up the California Dreamin’ series which was a lot of fun and hosted a variety of people working within the state of California, specifically the criminal justice system. The objective of those episodes was to show the audience, especially those outside of California, what could potentially be on the table for the future of their state. In a very strange and dangerous way, California is currently being pushed forward as the “model” that many democratic run states are attempting to follow. Given the current status of California, I really can't understand how anyone would think mimicking our state government would be a good idea. All we can really do is push out the information and hopefully it gets to the right places.
Season 1 essentially laid the groundwork and foundation for what the overall objective was, and that objective was to help others. When I initially started this blog in 2021 it was mainly for me to process a lot of things that were difficult to put into words. I truly never believed that people would actually start reading any of it. Writing has always been an outlet for me and more times than not it’s much easier for me to write things down than it is to speak. I always encourage people to put words on paper if it's a topic that is deserving of attention. Conversation and the social aspect of communication is awesome, but sometimes it lacks detail. Writing in that regard can provide both parties with an open line of communication where the finite details may create a more constructive dialogue for the future. I've truly enjoyed watching the blog and podcast grow and more importantly I have enjoyed seeing the impact that it’s had on those who have read and listened. I've had quite a few cops reach out to me directly telling me they appreciate the speaking points and topics as there aren’t very many people out there willing to address them. The rule of thumb that I have always used is that if the topic or issue itself is difficult to talk about, it's definitely worth talking about. Season 2 is going to be a lot of fun. I have a lot of guests in the hopper that are going to offer some unique perspectives. Like I have said many times before, I make it a point to try and pepper in some guests who are not necessarily related to the law enforcement community but can offer some perspective and insight that will be relatable to all. One of the things that I've tried to maintain from the get-go is creating content that could be relatable to anyone, not just cops. I think that if there was more of an active effort put into bridging the gap between the law enforcement community and the majority of society, we would have a lot less to argue about, and a lot more to talk about. Communication, especially in the arena of difficult or otherwise hostile topics, is something that we need to work on as a society overall. At this very moment we are in a very unstable and volatile position for the future. We are seeing the long-term results of the social justice movement and how the majority of those decisions are now negatively affecting society and allowing criminal enterprise to be more powerful than ever before. Most of the knee jerk reactions initiated by our city and state leaders are responsible for where we are now. Policing in America is on the brink of total collapse and the hiring pool is the shallowest it's ever been. Agencies are being forced to hire applicants that in times past would have been told “no thank you” or “don’t call us, we’ll call you.” They are hiring cops who either aren't ready yet, or have no business being in law enforcement at all. In a strange way, all the social justice reform actually made the probability of another event like George Floyd more probable now than ever before. Season 2 is going to focus on a variety of issues, but a common theme is going to be the future of our society and the future of policing in America. As much as others may argue, society and policing go hand in hand. One of the things I plan on introducing during some of the blog posts and episodes is the concept of history- recent history to be exact. The best part about policing in America is that it's young enough for us to look back to see the pitfalls and issues we have faced in our cop adolescence. Whatever the issue on the table may be, there's a high probability that we as cops have had to face that issue multiple times at some point within the last 100 years. What society needs to understand, and also needs to be mentally prepared for, is that where we are right now and the fight that we have coming against crime and criminals is going to require a certain level of pressure and violence. There's no easy way around it. We have to consider the fight we have coming and unfortunately, we will not be successful unless we are very heavy-handed. Law and department policy is what keeps us in check and prevents us from becoming corrupt in that regard. When it comes to the current fight against crime however, there's an operational tempo that we can control within those laws and policies, and right now that operational tempo needs to be hard, fast, and with a purpose. In the interim, as time goes by and we continue to let evil win, we are going to have to work even harder and more violently in the future to bring society back to some form of stability. I look forward to what season 2 will bring in terms of content and collaboration. Collaboration and creativity is something that I genuinely appreciate. On that note, if there’s anyone you think would be good to have as a guest on the show, or if you yourself think you'd be interested, shoot me an e-mail or message me on Instagram. I'm always looking for new ideas or people to collaborate with/have on the show. Thank you to everyone who has supported me over the years and thank you for giving me the motivation to keep all of this going. One thing that I say often is just that- keep fucking going. -Mac Don't let the title scare you, if you're part of the new generation, or you're the salty guy screaming in the parking lot...both of you need to read this. Communication is key, and we (cops) are very good at it. So why are we having such a hard time talking to the new generation about our expectations? If there was ever a “but you didn’t tell me to” generation in policing for America, this would be it.
One of the things that cops are the absolute best at is communicating with the general public. We do it for a living, and we do it hundreds, or even thousands of times throughout our workweek. Some of the general public may argue that we are actually horrible communicators, and I blame motor cops for making the highest contribution to that very skewed stereotype. Thanks guys. In all seriousness the majority of the time we are communicating with someone is in a scenario where, almost exclusively, there is a high level of stress involved. It’s the nature of the beast and the crux of our existence. Over time and experience on the road we become masters of verbal altercations and even more so masters of being able to reduce the most heated of scenarios to a very low simmer. It takes practice, and some are naturally better than others, but most cops with a decent amount of time on the road should have the ability to walk into any scenario, address the issues at hand, and create some type of resolve leaving the situation much calmer than what they initially walked into. If there was a single most prevalent constant in the world of law enforcement, verbal interaction would be it. That being said, why are we having such a hard time connecting with other members of our department? Specifically, the newest generation of law enforcement. Law enforcement is very different from other career choices. It’s linear to some jobs but also light years away from others. It’s one of the few jobs in the entire world where the end goal is to put ourselves out of business. We are literally taking away our revenue source via proactive patrol activity and ultimately, by arrest. I understand that is a very separate, and very deep rabbit hole, but for purposes of the text, I am simply comparing law enforcement to a business model/corporation. Much like I discussed in Post 14 and Video 17, there is no real tangible goal for the law enforcement employee in terms of actual profit other than doing your job for the right reasons, and simply receiving a paycheck. However, could those so-called “right reasons” lead to promotions and the like? Perhaps, but there is no guarantee that your efforts will ever be recognized or rewarded, especially in law enforcement. The scarier part of this argument that most of us choose to ignore is- if you read most law enforcement policy manuals across the United States, would you see any verbiage or directive stating that you the employee shall go out and arrest bad guys? I got news for you, most of them don’t, and most new generation cops are some of the first people to point that out. To put it into a sentence that I have heard with my own ears…”It doesn’t say that I have to do anything…” and that’s a scary thing to hear from a cop with maybe two years on the road and not much to show for it. Why the disconnect? Where did we go wrong? Why are we seeing such a bizarre dip in the lack of motivation? Why are the new kids so afraid of getting their hands dirty? Unfortunately, it’s much more complicated than what we assume is the root issue. The older cops are quick to point their tired and overworked fingers at the new generation and simply say “you guys’ suck.” They are quick to complain and then simply assume that the other half of that problem knows how to fix the issue. The problem is, however, they don’t. They don’t know how to fix the problem because they don’t have any clue what the problem actually is. If we ask them to do more, this new generation is going to ask, “how much more?” and the answer cannot be “just more.” Tangible goals are going to be the future of communication for this new group of cops and without them, we won’t see any positive results. The old concept of “jump!” and the employee says, “how high?” will now be “jump!” and the employee says, “what do I get if I jump?” More than tangibility, however, comes the reason why they are here and why they are jumping to begin with. In order for us to truly understand the issues, we need to be asking the right questions. And one of the most important questions we can ask is: why are fewer people than ever seeing this job as a calling? This job used to be something that was make or break, sink or swim. You either had the fortitude to do it, or you didn’t. There were no half-interested people, and if there were, they were washed out of the academy within the first week. The stragglers who still thought they could make it did their best to continue but were ultimately cut loose, and quite swiftly. Then you had the cream of the crop. The best of the best. Every single person in that graduating academy class was razor sharp and knew that they were not only made for this job, but they had what it takes to do the job well. More commonly these days we see about half of academy attendees simply “giving it a shot.” Don’t get me wrong, there’s nothing wrong with testing the water when it comes to an interest in any career field. But I would suggest “giving it a shot” is more applicable to golf, rock climbing, or yoga. Things that we could try and probably like or hate, and the world would lose nothing as a result if we chose yoga instead of golf. The problem is, for sake of society and criminal enterprise, those give-it-a-shots are graduating from the academy because the standards have been set so low to accommodate the supply and demand for a consistent police presence across the country. We are so hell bent on filling boots that we don’t care what feet go inside. As echoed by so many agencies right now “…we just need the bodies.” It’s only a matter of time before those desperate decisions cost us an infinite amount of chaos in the future. Remember that even before we had this issue, when things were actually operating in our favor, it only took one bad guy passing a fake twenty and one cop who made a horrible decision to change the course of history forever. That’s how close we skate to the edge every day and sadly most of society doesn’t understand that. So where does communication fall into this very complicated and sometimes seemingly irreparable mess we currently have as a country? If you’re reading or listening to this, it starts with you. You are part of the effort to change the problem. You have gone out of your way to listen to and or absorb the viewpoint of someone who is also trying to instill change in a career field that many people are currently walking away from. You are making an effort to seek someone else’s guidance or perspective in an effort to, hopefully, use said information to instill change in your agency or career field. How we move forward with that change is through communication. This new generation doesn’t need to be told that they suck, they need to be told how not to suck. They need to be taught the basic moral fibers that hold us together as humans in a civilized society where crime is afraid, and society feels safe. I, like many others, used to be of the mindset, it’s not my job to tell these kids what to do. I’m not an FTO, I’m not a supervisor, I’m not this, I’m not that. Well, I got some bad news for you, it is your job, it’s our job- that is, of course, if you want to be part of the reason why things get better. If not, fine. But don’t bitch about it to me, or anyone else. There is no singular or otherwise “I” in a career field that is based on a team collective. The sooner we figure that out, the sooner we may all actually see some positive reform efforts by command staff and our community, and ideally local and state government. If they are afraid to do the job itself, walk with them. If they are in fear of what could happen to them legally, teach them, especially case law. If they are confused as to why we exist, show them by example. There will never be a period in any cop’s life where this job will actually make sense. It’s the inner strife of repetition that will eventually drive us insane. It is important however to understand that while this job carries repetition, no day will ever be like the day you had before. If we were to reflect on Greek mythology, we would learn that no man ever steps into the same river twice, for it is never the same river and he is the never the same man. Learn, grow, teach, and above all communicate. Blog Post 15: All Gotham, no Batman. Where is California headed and how do we fix the future?5/20/2023 If we were to explore the world of crime and punishment on an international level, we would see a variety of tactics and legal systems varying from extremes to completely lawless societies. From beheadings to multi-generational prison sentences, there really is no limit to what the legal system is capable of on the international level. However, in some of these extremist-style law countries, is there a criminal enterprise within that country that is successful? Or are certain crimes almost non-existent because of the laws, and more importantly the punishments, that are set in place? I would say it’s a combination of both.
While there are many countries who still use public displays of violence as a means of legal punishment, is it a tactic that promotes fear? Or is it a tactic that promotes a polite society? There are 14 countries that still utilize capital punishment, the United States being one of them. Some countries like Russia have abolished capital punishment under a moratorium unlike some South American countries who have abolished it entirely with the exception of wartime executions. There is a small group of countries including Canada where capital punishment and/or executions are completely abolished. The major difference that sets them all apart aside from the method, however, is the legal system within that country, specifically the due process of law. There is something to be said about due process and what we have afforded to us in the United States overall. While it may not be perfect, we are not quick to remove your hand via sword for shoplifting. I’ve said this many times before, but if there are some of you out there who feel that this country does not afford you fair and impartial treatment in the arena of the legal system, I encourage you to visit various parts of the world, break the law, and then write me. I assure you we won’t be sitting down for coffee to discuss your findings anytime soon. I will be the very first to acknowledge that the United States does have some pitfalls and challenges when it comes to the legal system, and not to beat a dead horse, I have also yet to find its equal in the realm of international law and order. With the legal system being fairly consistent in terms of foundation, why are we at an all time high for violent crimes, homicide, property crimes, organized crime, drug related crimes, and drug related deaths? The answer is simple: we keep voting for it. More importantly, we have government leaders and their cohorts who keep writing it. The argument could be made that the votes are what count, and the people should decide. I absolutely agree that the people should decide, but that decision is based solely on what is being supplied as options for said people. Even more important than the vote is what is being advertised when it comes to the actual verbiage of the measure itself. Let’s take a journey back to the fall of 2014. We were on the rebound from the recession and life was good. Staffing for law enforcement was plentiful and we were slowly growing to the point of being able to control the streets once again. The criminal element in California wasn’t completely in check but there was definitely a grasp on the throat of evil. In the fall of 2014, many Californians would cast their votes for a Proposition called “The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act.” The name itself was enough for many Californians to vote yes. It sounded great, and why would anyone vote against that? The proposition details, however, were as follows: “Proposition 47, a law that will change certain low-level crimes from potential felonies to misdemeanors. The savings from reduced incarceration costs will be invested into drug and mental health treatment, programs for at-risk students in K-12 schools, and victim services. Individuals with a prior felony record for any of the following low-level, nonviolent offenses or who are currently serving time for the following crimes may qualify to change their record or their sentence to a misdemeanor: Simple drug possession, Petty theft under $950, Shoplifting under $950, Forgery under $950, Writing a bad check under $950, Receipt of stolen property under $950. Individuals who are currently incarcerated for offenses committed in the state of California that are impacted by Proposition 47 can seek to be resentenced and released (this is known as resentencing). Individuals who have been previously convicted of these felonies for crimes committed in the state of California can apply to have them changed on their record to misdemeanors (this is known as reclassification). Removal of a felony record can reduce immigration consequences and help remove barriers to jobs, housing and stability.” The objective was to essentially save/reallocate millions of dollars by relaxing and altering laws and punishments under the assumption that the offender(s) would completely comply with the expectations of a civilized and crime free society. Nothing, and I mean nothing, could have prepared us for what the passing of this legislation did for the state of California. Now 8 years later in 2023, we could pick any catastrophic topic that we are currently facing as an issue in California and there would be a very quick and readily identifiable association to the passing of Proposition 47. Even using the words “safe schools” in modern day is a joke. Our schools are the most dangerous they have ever been. Record high violence, record high drug use, and record high drug related deaths. In addition to the crime statistics, our streets surrounding these schools are plagued with homeless encampments and overall filth. One of the major issues we saw with the post-passing of Proposition 47 was the dollar amounts associated to crimes. Would it surprise you to know that most of these thieves have itemized lists written ahead of time so that they don’t exceed $950? Or when they try to cash stolen checks, they leave it in the ballpark of $900? Or when they steal or otherwise obtain stolen goods it’s under the dollar amount of $950? Why? They know they won’t be charged with a felony, and in some counties, they know they won’t even be charged at all. We literally gave criminals a road map as to how to avoid going to prison, evade prosecution and formal probation, and still make money. All the while we did nothing to stop it. The result? Tax bases going to ground zero, communities suffering, and businesses leaving the state giving Sacramento the finger on their way out the door. These retail stores are multi-million-dollar companies, they can deal with the ebb and flow of loss. Since the pandemic, however, retail theft has skyrocketed, and business owners are starting to see the financial impact. Any good investor or business owner knows when “the cost of doing business” starts to become a true loss of profit, they are going to get out, and quickly. In that scenario, not only did you lose the tax base, but you also lost jobs and employability. Eventually, the community members will have to make a choice, and most of them are choosing to leave. Before you know it, what was once a beautiful city by the bay, full of businesses both large and small, culture, fun, tourism, and an amazing place to visit is now one of the most dangerous places to go in California. Along with their allocation funding, Proposition 47 also focused a lot of its verbiage on drug and rehabilitation programs. Some people will argue that Proposition 47 was not the direct cause of the homeless epidemic. I agree, but Proposition 47 did however create a direct shot highway to get there. Proposition 47 did not create more homelessness in the state of California simply upon its passing. It was initially a very slow and gradual process, but once that ball got rolling it would soon be impossible to stop. That big rolling ball was a disgusting combination of heroin, property crimes, and an unsecured border. In the years following the passing of Proposition 47, heroin was moving into California more consistently and aggressively than any other drug on the market. It was cheap, abundant, and one of the most addictive narcotics currently in existence. Unlike its drug cohorts, heroin was an opioid, and unlike meth, you didn’t stay awake all night dismantling a VCR. As the years went on, we would see record numbers of drug-related deaths, drug-related criminal activity, and a homeless population that was almost completely addicted to, or at one point consistently used, heroin. We asked ourselves as a society, how could things possibly get any worse? Little did we know, they absolutely could. (Synthetic opioids have entered the chat). Fentanyl was the deadly icing on the cake for an already horrific and out of control homeless population. It’s important to remember that Jerry Brown was the architect of Proposition 47, and his predecessor Governor Newsom still sings its praises. Governor Newsom still to this day will not truly address the growing homelessness and drug epidemic that we have been facing for almost an entire decade. He will also never address the direct correlation between illegal drugs and homelessness, and more importantly, the illegal drugs that cross our border every day that allow the homeless/drug dependency issue to worsen. It would truly be a different feeling for society if we were seeing success in that regard, but the homeless population is steadily increasing with each passing year. For the year 2022 we saw a 30% increase overall. Nothing is changing in that regard; in fact, it’s getting significantly worse. In hindsight, Californians didn’t pass the safe schools act; they passed a hand developed criminal marketing system that has grown into a now out of control drug and criminal enterprise with homelessness on every street corner as the visual blight. How much worse will things get before we see any real effort to address the root issues? While being an optimist is respectable, I too believed at one point that things couldn’t get worse. Now that we are here, I can only imagine what things will look like in ten years if we continue down this very dark and dangerous road. The important thing to remember is that any sort of change will never come on a societal level. Those efforts are admirable, but they will never truly make a large enough impact to inflict change. Any real efforts that will carry significant change will come from state and local government- and in that scenario the only way we will see change is in one of three scenarios: 1. Californians stop allowing leftist or otherwise liberal policies to come to the table (not gonna happen unless we vote them out). 2. Californians vote democratic leaders out of office (probably not gonna happen any time soon). 3. Californians vote on what is best for the law abiding, tax paying, safety seeking, citizens of the state of California, and further, stop letting political allegiance to the democratic party prevent you from saying that where we are right now as a state is completely unacceptable. Option 3 is where we need to get. I don’t care who you voted for, I don’t care what political party you associate with, none of that matters, or at least it shouldn’t, in the realm of cleaning up our streets. Politics has become such a portion of our personal identity, both right and left, that we have lost sight of the fact that we can still agree on what is morally ethical for our children’s futures. We give political leaders too much power as it is. Where we are right now as a state is a perfect example of blindly following political leadership based on party allegiance. If we aren’t careful, our options will become fewer and fewer before we have no more options, just life as it is, carnage and all. At the end of the day, if you had a republican, a democrat, and an independent all in the same room, the likelihood of all three of them agreeing that they want their kids to be able to play outside until the streetlights come on is pretty much a guarantee. Get back to the basics of human interaction and making decisions based on public safety, and we will find success. The Executive Branch of government was ultimately designed to instill law and order among society. It was designed to preserve public peace, and to ensure those who disrupted said peace were held accountable. This societal endeavor first began in the mid 1800’s and in due time there would be law enforcement entities in cities and counites nationwide. As time went on, the nation would see a variety of law enforcement agencies plant their roots in the ground as many cities and counties officially incorporated in or around the 1850’s. At one point, however, there was almost too much law and not enough order. There would be Sheriff’s Offices, Marshall’s Offices, Police Departments, Bounty Hunters, Bondsman, Constables - all sharing some portion of jurisdiction or legal authority that would sometimes overcrowd the overall objective. More times than not the main source of any issue seemed to circulate around one thing- money. In that regard, not much has changed. With money, however, comes greed, and greed is a byproduct of corruption.
Corruption would manage to keep its presence in the world of law enforcement for decades, and it still exists today. We would see major paradigm shifts in the 1920’s, 1950’s, and a big one in the 1960’s. After the overhaul of the NYPD in the late 1960’s we saw high levels of internal corruption become less, and less, common. It did, however, still exist but more so in intermittent spurts like what we saw with the LAPD Rampart scandal or the NYPD’s Seventy Fifth precinct. Those incidents were isolated, and from a specific station or unit. They rarely involved an entire agency like we saw with the Knapp Commission that involved many individuals, and in varying degrees of administration and political offices. That level of organizational corruption, however, is more than likely gone for good. Or should I say, harder to get away with these days. It’s important to remember that corruption needs two things in order to be successful- opportunity, and a lack of supervision. To better understand how we have evolved as a career field, we need to first identify the reformation timeline and how we have grown over the years. There were ultimately three stages of strategic policing eras within the United States. The first was the political era. This era began in the mid 1800’s and lasted until the 1920’s. It was an era focusing on political ties to policing. In a sentence, taking care of certain tasks or issues to appease politicians. The second stage was the reform era. The reform era was a proactive reformation process because of the pre-existing political era. Its objective was to move policing away from political ties and focus on exposing corruption. The reform era thrived from the 1920’s well into the 1970’s. There were major milestones in terms of success for this era, but there was also a very high level of corruption that was identified along the way. Many of these corruption cases would expose internal illegal activity at very high levels, including local government offices. Lastly, and most recently, we have our current era which is the era of community policing and problem solving. This has proven to be the most effective form of policing to date. It’s not perfect, but if we were to create a visible graph or pie chart based on a timeline alone, we would see a very low corruption rate, and a very high success rate even with the pitfalls we have experienced over the last decade. While the numbers have drastically improved for corruption and overall good standing among society, I would caution that statistic’s future with respect to the current climate of law enforcement, specifically the future applicants. Almost 4 years ago, some of the larger agencies in California would receive thousands and thousands of applications for an academy seat. Out of those thousands of applicants, the list would be narrowed down to hundreds with a graduating class of much less. Even during the recession of 2008, Academy classes in California were still full as students would pay their own tuition as a non-employee just to graduate. In the grand scheme of things, it was an extremely competitive job market with many people who would apply more than once if they really wanted the job- and there’s the buzz word, “if they really wanted the job.” The process in which you become a cop is not easy, and the road to get there is paved with sharp and sometimes very rigorous stone. However, as we have seen over the last few years, that rigorous stone has become more of a smooth asphalt, and much easier to navigate. Why? In a sentence, nobody wants to be a cop anymore, so we must lower the bar and make the road easier to meet the accommodations of new applicants who are far less qualified than what we have seen in years past. The important thing to remember is why the bar was high, and why the stones were on the road in the first place. They were there to get rid of the ones who couldn’t hack it, and to weed out the people who had no business being in law enforcement. Now, those people are the top candidates in the running because all the other applicants with a brain in their head decided to do something else with their life, and it was as far away from being a cop as possible. Overall, the number of applicants has drastically plummeted nationwide. For the first time in California’s history, law enforcement academy classes are seeing empty seats. I want to be clear, that has never, ever happened before in the history of California law enforcement. To say there needs to be cause for concern in that regard would be the understatement of the millennium. This begs the question; how do we get future cops in those empty seats? The better question in my opinion is…why are the seats empty to begin with? While the first question is relevant and needs to be addressed, the question is based on an incentive, and not based on self-worth and motivation. Law enforcement is not a corporation based on earnings and financial growth, it’s a paramilitary branch of government that needs to remain void of tangible goals based on financial incentives, or does it? Over the past year or two I have seen more and more law-enforcement agencies advertising hiring bonuses/incentives. Some agencies started out with dollar amounts in the ten-thousand range and they were contingent with a contract, it was not a lump sum, the payment was partially added to your paycheck over the course of five years, etc. Then I started to notice agencies offering relocation incentives along with a hiring bonus. Some Southern California agencies were willing to pay handsomely to get you to relocate, and even further, some agencies were even offering to pay a percentage of your mortgage on your new home. The main issue with Southern California and the Bay Area is there’s nowhere a cop can live on their salary within a hundred-mile radius. For those that do work in those areas, most of them either commute or they find a small rental property and split it with co-workers. The bottom line, the cost of housing is astronomical in certain parts of California, and conveniently enough that’s also where the highest crime rates are. It was becoming extremely apparent that agencies were hurting for employees, and badly. When I started to dig deeper, I saw that the higher the incentives, the more the agency was suffering. The more they had to put up financially to grab the attention of a future employee, the more I saw how horrific the conditions were. Then I started talking to friends who worked for agencies that were currently offering bonuses. The most common phrase I heard was “we just don’t have enough bodies.” Then I would hear about internal issues, problems with political push back, defunding, vaccine mandates, restricting cop’s abilities to their jobs because they want to appease radical justice groups, city council, the list goes on. The bottom line- people were leaving in droves because their agency chose to appease public opinion rather than the livelihood and safety of their own employees. The result? They are now having to spend money they don’t have just to get a body in a patrol car. The highest hiring/pay incentive I have heard of thus far was from the Alameda Police Department located in Alameda, California. The city of Alameda has a population of seventy-six thousand people, and the city sits just west of Oakland on the San Francisco Bay. The payment/incentive breakdown was as follows: $25,000 paid upon hiring, and $55,000 paid upon completion of their field training program. That’s a $75,000 incentive. I understand there are possibly contracts and other things attached to that money, but I wanted to focus my speaking point on the lump sum. At this time, that is the highest paid hiring incentive for law enforcement in the entire nation. Some would make the argument about how great that sounds, and I agree, $75,000 is a lot of money, and it would be awesome to receive it. However, talk to the employees who currently work there and see what kind of a price tag comes with that money, the “fine print” if you will. Remember, nothing is ever free, especially in the realm government. Talk to the employees who are ten to fifteen years on the job at that agency. Don’t talk to the new boots who don’t know any different yet, don’t talk to the brass who are one foot out the door, talk to the cops. The slick sleeve vets or the supervisors who don’t wear bars. Talk to the ones who were at that agency when things were great, and who are still there when things are bad. You may expose yourself to some negative people in this venture, but in the mix, you will find the ones who can give you some true insight into why their agency needs to throw money at recruits and laterals just to stay afloat. In the end, you’ll probably discover that getting a job where you get no hiring incentive at all may be exactly what you’re looking for. Now a word of warning for those of you who wear bars, and for the rest of you who are willing to put in the work to prevent your agency from going down the road to ruin. Every agency in the nation right now is on the verge of losing control, and everyone is faced with some type of challenge regarding employee retention. As a result, control is, or will soon be, lost. If your agency does not require any type of hiring incentive to get quality applicants, great- keep it that way as long as possible, if not forever. Your agency should be able to sell itself, and, spoiler alert, what do you think the number one way you will continue to gain quality applicants? Your current employees. You need them way more than they need you, and sadly, many agencies think otherwise. If you want to sustain any form of control over the next several years, it is imperative that the agency takes care of its employees. If you don’t, you will lose quality cops and your replacements will be walking, talking, lawsuits. Eventually you will be forced to spend money on hiring incentives and the like, only to think that had you simply addressed some of the small things along the way, you could’ve kept the good ones. Blog Post 13: Is anybody listening? An open letter to command staff and supervisors nationwide4/9/2023 Is anybody listening? Do you hear the car doors shutting? Do you hear the Velcro? Do you hear the sound of plastic against steal? Do you hear the sigh of relief as the literal weight is lifted off their shoulders? I’m not talking about their vest; I’m talking about the job. I’m talking about the cop who just finished their last day on the job- and not for retirement, but for leaving this career field entirely. The sad part is this cop wasn’t one of the ones who couldn’t hack it, no short stroke boot who couldn’t make the cut, no punk kid who thought he needed show society who was boss, no lackadaisical officer-safety nightmare trainee, no, this was a cop with many years on who finally realized that enough was enough, and who finally realized his agency was the issue. The sad part is, even on his departure, nobody listened, and nobody cared. Despite this cop making up his mind a long time ago, it would’ve been nice to hear some type of concern as his departure became a known reality among the agency. Short of quitting on the spot, there’s no real way to Houdini or otherwise sneak out the door to another job without your department knowing something is in the works.
Some may ask if I am speaking directly about a certain individual or employee, and my answer is no, I am speaking about many individuals and employees, some of which I have known firsthand and worked with for many years, and some of which I have had the pleasure of meeting in person over the years from agencies across the nation. The issue of cops leaving abruptly isn’t some anomaly that is occurring out of nowhere, and for no reason. It’s been an ongoing issue building up for several years, and cops are finally making the choice to address the issues we are facing in this career field. If said issues are not addressed, or more importantly those issues are not heard by those who need to hear them, then the employee is forced to live in a toxic environment or break the cycle. Cycle breakers are rare in the arena of law enforcement, but they have been becoming increasingly more active over the last two years. I consider myself to be a cycle breaker, but a cycle breaker who is trying to break the cycle within my agency. Hence all of the things I am doing here and now. There are also cycle breakers who fully acknowledge that they can no longer remain in a toxic working environment, and they ultimately choose to leave. A word of warning to those of you who are thinking “while this may all be true, the people who are leaving are doing so on good terms and expressed no ill will towards the agency.” I agree, however, consider the leap of faith the employee is taking by leaving their agency as 10, 15, or even 20-year cop on the job, and the unknown abyss that comes with stepping out that door for the last time. That feeling is quite scary, and after talking to the people who have done it, that was without question the scariest part of leaving. Yes, they have done their homework and they have acquired new employment, but their concerns for the immediate future are absolutely valid. What if that employment doesn’t work out? What if the grass was greener on the other side and now, they are deep in the weeds looking at green pastures where they once were? At the end of the day this is not a social dynamic or relationship, it’s a means for us to make money and eventually retire. My point is, all cops have contingency plans in every pocket and for every situation, so why on earth would they ever bad mouth the agency or even be somewhat candid and honest on their departure knowing that same administration may watch them come crawling back someday? Believe me, I’ve seen it happen more than a few times with my own eyes. I’ve seen people leave my agency and venture elsewhere only to realize it wasn’t as great as they thought it would be. Ultimately, they chose to come back and kiss the proverbial ring asking for their job back. In a strange way, it was almost as if the administration enjoyed that power and enjoyed seeing people leave only to return within the year. There were also some, however, who left and never returned. Those people, however, are the ones that we as an agency talk about the least, and if they are discussed, it’s almost with the attitude of “we are better off without you.” Nothing could be further from the truth. The incidents I am referencing above were of course before the year 2020, which I truly believe will be the biggest paradigm shift for law enforcement for the next few decades if not much longer. The year 2020 was the ultimate test for a variety of agencies nationwide. Cops were finally able to pull back the curtain to meet the wizard, and to their disappointment, it was not what they were hoping for. They saw the harsh and ugly truth. They saw they were not valued at all. They saw politics clouding over a variety of issues and ultimately many cops were left with a very bitter taste in their mouths. Even with regime changes and management being moved or replaced, the boots on the ground still remembered how they were treated for the better part of 6 months and even further, how they were treated in the years following. Tactics and use of force updates were constant, and nothing remotely good. New policies were implemented that endangered cops and emboldened the criminals. New senate and assembly bills would be passed that only appeased the masses who were screaming for justice and ultimately made it harder for cops to avoid another horrible situation like what we saw in 2020. Law enforcement agencies would cut their most proactive crime fighting units and quite literally in some cities reduce their police force by forty percent. All this progressive action and cops were still expected to do their job the same way, if not better, than they were before…and people wonder why nobody wants to do this job anymore. Fun fact, the City of Minneapolis recently posted a position for a “Community Commission on Police Oversight” also referred to as CCPO. In that same job posting, they also posted the position of Police Officer. There were over two hundred applicants for the position of CCPO. There were two applicants for the position of Police Officer. Yes, two. My question that I pose to the leadership of law enforcement is, what have you done, or what are you doing, to ensure that your employees feel as if they are appreciated within your agency? Sometimes we confuse the word “valued” with “appreciated.” Both are complimentary in nature and should absolutely be viewed as such. Being valued, however, would imply that the employer considers you to be beneficial to the agency. While we can all agree that being valued is important, being appreciated recognizes the employee’s full worth to the agency as opposed to just the benefits they will provide. Looking at those characteristics side by side, would you rather your employer recognize your benefits to the agency, or your full worth to the agency? One certainly sounds more long term, career building, stable, and overall genuine than the other. At the end of the day, despite any words I may share or experiences that we can all agree are quite linear, if you have tried, and tried, and tried, and nothing is changing, maybe it is time to go somewhere else. There’s an enormous difference between complaining about something and identifying problems and providing solutions. In a time where morale is very low, the biggest mistake any administrator can make is listening to the advice from co-workers or peers who are currently on the same pay scale, with the same benefits, and the same retirement. The likelihood of both of you agreeing that nothing is wrong, and morale is fine, is highly probable. There will be no concern for the boots on the ground, the same boots that provide the public presence for your agency in every way, shape or form, every day, and every night. Quite literally, there will be no cause for concern for anything at all as it is very hard to see these issues from the highest point of the castle with company that eats and sleeps the same as you do. And the boots on the ground see this, or even worse, they see nothing at all. They see no change, no effort, no concern, just business as usual. The bottom line, if there are problems within your agency, and you have good employees who are being proactive in the hunt for remedies to improve morale, and willing to help implement those remedies, you should probably listen to them. I assure you, when the time comes and nothing has moved and nothing has changed, they will be the first to leave and go somewhere where they are truly appreciated. The leftovers you’ll be stuck with as an agency will consist of those who were willing to bitch, but never willing to help. Those who were salty from birth and who never cared about public perception or personal responsibility. Those who picked this job for the wrong reasons. Those who will hold out as long as they can, jaded and angry. Those who will be human question marks after they barely pass field training and wander into the parking lot with enough liability strapped to their belt to mimic that of an atom bomb. In a sentence…the cops who should have never been cops to begin with will be the cream of your crop. In that regard, good luck with your future endeavors as an agency. Police reform that began in the year 2020 is now approaching its third birthday, however, there is little to be celebrated. We changed the game in regards to policing practices, technique, communication, application, tactics, and so forth. We even went as far as banning certain practices that were perfectly safe and effective- but because of one incident we made it a universal death warrant. We took funding from our local law enforcement agencies and as a result most of them lost their specialty units or teams that delt with the worst of worst on a regular basis in some of the most violent cities in the country. So what happens when you take the dog away from the flock? What happens when you make society as vulnerable as possible? Well, you are witnessing it every day on the news. Now more than ever, criminal violence is on the rise. Random and horrific acts of violence are being carried our night after night. Some people don’t understand how the monster works. The monster will rely solely on opportunity, and they will only come out when they know it is safe to do so. When they realize there is nothing to fear, they will walk among us and strike whenever opportunity presents itself. Lately, that opportunity is very frequent.
There is however something to consider, and that is the simple fact that nobody is born a monster. Yes, there are people who are born into this world destined for evil. Those people are far and few between, but they do exist. For purposes of this rabbit hole I am about to go down, I’m not talking about serial killers or the like, I’m talking about those who are born into a world of criminal enterprise without a choice. The children who never stood a chance simply based on who birthed them. There is no other innocence in the world than that of a child. They have no preconceived notions, no biases, no prejudice, no concept of hatred or evil. They just have eyes, ears, a mouth, and a brain that is starting to slowly wrinkle. I want to talk about children because they are the tipping point for the future. They are the future of criminality or the future of peace. How we get from one to the other is a very slippery slope. So how do we change the future? We start with the youth of today. As of lately I feel as if the margin for criminal opportunity has been getting lower and lower in terms of age. I encourage anyone to look at the statistical data collected for the last few years and pay close attention to the suspects date of birth. We are seeing a terrifying rise in heinous crimes being committed by teenagers. The term “teenagers” is applicable to both minority and adult (18 years or older), but the simple fact that most of these kids are between 16 to 20 on average is absolutely alarming. The crimes themselves are also noteworthy as many of them involve firearms. Before anyone opens their mouth about gun legislation, from every case I have studied for this piece, all firearms used were either stolen or otherwise illegally obtained. Fun fact, a fully automatic Glock takes more paperwork to buy than refinancing your home, if your state allows it, yet they are being tossed around like candy in Detroit…where they are illegal to own. Just sayin. Most kids in the scenario where life has presented them with a social disposition from birth, they will not see it as such. They will see it as normal. They will see it as their way of life. Considering how little control they have, they cannot be blamed for the parents they got, or the house in which they live. I stress the word “parent” because of the simple fact that most of these kids getting arrested are still teenagers- minors, not adults. Yet they are literally running and gunning as if they are under no supervision at all. This begs the question of parenting, or a lack there of, and how much that influences these children and their decision making. I would argue, a lot. If not all of it. Change or going against the current in that lifestyle can be challenging. After being a cop in the same area for many years, I have gotten to know the criminals as well as their families. In some scenarios its one bad apple. In others, it’s the whole tree. There are some families that are generationally and inherently criminal by nature or design. More times than not, their children will follow in their footsteps. Seldom do we see cycle breakers in these scenarios. A cycle breaker is someone who is able to see the toxicity of a scenario or circumstance and remove themselves from it. However, when they do so, they are often met with resistance or guilt from their family. They will often hear words like “oh you think you’re better than us” or “wow look at you, you forgot where you came from?” The people who use those words are cowards and they are inherently lazy. They are content with that way of life because they know no other. They are also jealous of the cycle breaker because they know deep down, they did the right thing. However, when these people are parents, family, or friends, those words may sting just enough to get you drop your bag of good ideas at the curb and go back inside. So why the young age and why a life of crime and violence? Now more than ever they are being told and taught by the powers that be that cops are bad, crime is good, there are no rules, and you can take whatever you want. Think about it, this nation burned for 9 months and that was completely normalized by the media, by local and state government, and by society. Cities and towns destroyed, dozens killed, in an effort to curb violence? Have we lost our minds? We opened the flood gates and we let it happen. I say “we” because we are a society. We are the ones who allowed this pendulum to swing. Everyone was so caught up in the activity that they forgot about the cause. All of these outreach groups and activists were so loud for so long, and my question for all of them is…where are you now? You see, the issues we are facing today as a result of the year 2020 does not fall on the backs of law enforcement entirely. If we consider the George Floyd incident, and the concern that it created about policing in America, there should have been an even more overwhelming concern for society in general. The reality is, we can reform and change policing in America as much as we want, but if don’t change society along with it, there will be an uncontrollable wave of criminal behavior that will be impossible to fix- and that’s exactly where we are right now. The bottom line is that the numbers don’t lie. As a nation crime is on the rise, policing and quality applicants are down, and there are kids who would have been able to break the cycle, but now they won’t. The sad part is, one of those bad kids and one of those bad cops will meet someday. And the result? It will be another atom bomb, and society will once again have to deal with the fallout. The children are the future, plain and simple. Eudaimonia is a Greek word that translates to “good spirit.” It is a speaking point and philosophy that has been adopted by many walks of life since its inception in 300BC. Aristotle viewed this discipline as the highest human good, the only good that is desirable for its own sake, rather than for the sake of something else. In a simpler set of words, living virtuously. It is important however to not confuse virtu with happiness. In fact, living virtuously may force us to do things that may be hard or otherwise unpleasant to do, and in some ways, rock the proverbial boat. This is a crossroads that many of us will face at some point in our lives. The question is, will we be virtuous in these times of challenge, or will we choose to look the other way and assume that someone else will?
There is an old story that I think of often about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody and Nobody. There was an important job that needed to get done. Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it. Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it. Somebody got angry about that because it was Everybody’s job. Everybody thought Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn’t do it. It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have. In the realm of law-enforcement this is sometimes a story that repeats itself over, and over again. The question is, if you do step up to the plate and make your voice heard in the realm of living virtuously, will you be viewed as a martyr, or a heretic? More times than not when we do choose to voice our opinions, they are seldom heard by those who actually need to hear them. Rank and file in a paramilitary organization does in fact create a fairly wide disconnect from the boots to the brass. However, your immediate supervisor will generally see and experience the same gripes or issues you do to some degree. The problem that sometimes stops the cause for concern, is that the farther up the chain it goes, that concern will be a moot point unless it affects the chain itself. That issue is uniform for any career field that requires any sort of organization or command chain when it comes to management and operations. I suppose the real question would be, does the chain of command actually care, or are they simply trying to keep the ship from capsizing? My answer? It’s a little bit of both. As amazing as it would be for our command staff to care about us unconditionally, it would only last for so long before it ended in total catastrophe. If they were to cater to our every need and want, it would only be a matter of time before the ship crashed into the iceberg, IE they are focused on the needs of the crew entirely, and nobody is manning the wheel. The other extreme is they ignore the crew completely and run the engines into the ground, eventually, the ship stops moving because the crew keeping it alive has ether died from exhaustion or the engines themselves have failed from constant abuse. Either way you slice it, both of those ships aren’t getting very far and eventually will be lost at sea, or at the bottom of it. If we transitioned from the ship concept to the concept of parenting, it would be the same comparison. Being overly concerned with hurting feelings or giving employees everything they want is the same concept as giving a child no rules and the freedom to eat ice cream for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Eventually the child will become completely oblivious to structure and balance and begin vomiting because all they have consumed for the day is sugar and milk. The other side of that scenario is a piece of plywood for a mattress and an abacus for entertainment, and ice cream doesn’t exist. Both extremes will end in failure. If we were to introduce the concept of balance into this equation, we would find a very healthy living environment with structure and control, and ice cream on the weekends. At the end of the day, understand that in a career field that is a 24 hour 365 operation, any change or new ideas will come with some form of blow back. The more extreme the change, the more blow back you’ll get. However, we won’t know until we try, and more importantly, we won’t know until we communicate. Communication is probably one of the most underrated tools we carry. In a world of phones and digital messaging platforms, we often loose the face-to-face interaction. If you need the paper trail, send the email. If you don’t, talk to your supervisor. Create dialogue. Use that face-to-face interaction to show them that your idea is not only something that you wrote down, but something that are passionate about. You’d be surprised how much more powerful a memo is when you hand deliver it and explain it in person. In a time where it is already difficult to be a cop, there is no sense in making our jobs harder. Want training? Ask for it. Want policy changes? Write it up. Have a good idea? Talk about it. Want to make your agency better? DO IT. Going back to story of Everybody, Somebody, Anybody and Nobody- be the one who says, “I got this.” |
Author: Mac RollinsMac Rollins began his career in law enforcement in 2010 in Northern California. He has worked in a variety of assignments and is currently assigned to his agency's Detectives Bureau. |